Three main factors contributed to India’s defeat in the ICC Twenty20 World Cup


In this matchup, Rishabh Pant will face off against Dinesh Karthik.

Pant performs best in white-ball cricket when he is given the freedom to begin the innings without any constraints. Regardless of whether someone agrees with it or not, this is true. He didn’t have many big runs, but he still displayed a lot of drive. Karthik, a 37-year-old man who had been regarded as semi-retired, joined the fray as soon as the job was upgraded to a middle-order role.

The role of a designated finisher in the Playexch Indian Premier League (IPL), with a target of 25 to 30 off 10 balls, is a fun challenge for him on the sub continental surfaces where he plays. But as soon as the ball started to jag and bounce a bit more than usual, he was discovered to be deficient.

One game before the semifinals, the “Karthik experimental” was abruptly abandoned, and the club management considered Pant as a potential left-handed replacement.

Why did the team choose to switch to Pant and cite a tactical adjustment although Karthik had spent the previous four months training specifically for this contest? As a result, he really doubted the legitimacy of the scenario as a whole.

This was simply done in order to make room for Rahul at the top.

Refusing to use Yuzvendra Chahal

Even though Yuzvendra Chahal hasn’t played in a single Twenty20 World Cup match because he was dropped off the team in one edition and placed on the bench in the other, he is India’s all-time leader in wickets taken in Twenty20 Internationals.

Despite having favourable match-ups against the English batting order, Chahal, who has the ability to turn his leg breaks and bowl a terrific googly, was not utilized.

They chose Axar Patel instead, who ended up being disappointing.

His wicket-to-wicket bowling on true wickets with even bounce made batsmen difficult to make runs since they were cannon fodder for him. Alex Hales or Iftikhar Ahmed were amusing themselves by whacking him out of the park. Whoever it was, neither of them cared. He took part in five games, and in the majority of them, he was unable to bowl the number of overs required, which resulted to an average of 8.62 runs being scored for every over he bowled.

The idea that he should be pushed up in the batting order did not hold water because he rarely had a good hit. This raises the question of why Chahal would wish to protect himself by using a cushion in the form of a less talented batter, like Harshal Patel. If the top five specialised bats in the lineup are unable to produce the necessary figures, how could a bowler complete that task?

Adil Rashid’s prominence is a superb illustration of this.

Dravid’s capacity for judgment

Dravid has securely established himself as the team’s head coach over the past year, but now is the right moment for him to dismantle the current system and build a new one.

Before the following online betting Twenty20 World Cup, bats like Shubman Gill, Prithvi Shaw, Rahul Tripathi, and Rajat Patidar need to be improved because they have demonstrated tremendous promise.

In a similar way, replacing Avesh Khan in the Asia Cup due to a few subpar end overs appeared to be a touch inconsistent. While Rahul was given numerous chances to succeed, Avesh only needed a few subpar efforts to be eliminated.

It was decided that Avesh needed to be replaced by Harshal Patel after his two subpar performances in the Asia Cup. But once he had taken Avesh’s place, his condition was so bad that he wasn’t even given a chance to play in any of the games.

Despite the fact that Dravid must make some difficult choices, he hasn’t significantly changed things in the past 12 months. Does he intend to keep doing that in the future? Watch out for this void over here.

Read More: click

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.